Running with records-data is a cardinal facet of programming, and effectively figuring out record beingness is important for strong exertion improvement. Figuring out the quickest manner to cheque if a record exists successful C++ tin importantly contact your exertion’s show, particularly once dealing with many record operations. This article explores assorted strategies successful modular C++, C++eleven, C++14, C++17, and C, evaluating their show and highlighting champion practices for optimum record beingness checks.
Utilizing std::filesystem::exists (C++17 and future)
Since C++17, the std::filesystem room offers the about easy and mostly most popular manner to cheque for record beingness. The exists() relation provides a cleanable, level-autarkic resolution.
std::filesystem::exists boasts fantabulous show and readability. It handles assorted record sorts, together with daily records-data, directories, and symbolic hyperlinks. Its transverse-level quality eliminates the demand for OS-circumstantial codification.
Illustration:
see <filesystem> see <iostream> int chief() { std::filesystem::way filePath("my_file.txt"); if (std::filesystem::exists(filePath)) { std::cout << "Record exists!\n"; } other { std::cout << "Record does not be.\n"; } instrument zero; }
C++eleven/14 Options with stat
Earlier C++17, checking record beingness active utilizing level-circumstantial features oregon less-flat scheme calls. 1 communal methodology makes use of the stat() scheme call (oregon _stat() connected Home windows). This attack is mostly sooner than utilizing streams for specified beingness checks.
Piece stat() gives record accusation past beingness, it is somewhat much analyzable than std::filesystem::exists.
Illustration:
see <sys/stat.h> // oregon <sys/sorts.h> and <sys/stat.h> connected any methods see <iostream> int chief() { struct stat buffer; if (stat("my_file.txt", &buffer) == zero) { std::cout << "Record exists!\n"; } other { std::cout << "Record does not be.\n"; } instrument zero; }
Utilizing fopen() successful C
Successful C, fopen() is a communal attack to cheque record beingness. Making an attempt to unfastened a record successful publication manner (“r”) volition neglect if the record doesn’t be. This methodology is transportable however entails beginning a record grip, which is somewhat little businesslike if you don’t mean to publication the record.
Piece fopen() is elemental, it is mostly slower than stat() for axenic beingness checks, particularly connected Unix-similar programs.
Illustration:
see <stdio.h> int chief() { Record record = fopen("my_file.txt", "r"); if (record) { fclose(record); // Adjacent the record since we lone checked for beingness. printf("Record exists!\n"); } other { printf("Record does not be.\n"); } instrument zero; }
Show Issues and Champion Practices
For C++17 and future, std::filesystem::exists is mostly the really useful technique owed to its readability, portability, and bully show. Successful earlier C++ variations oregon C, stat() is usually sooner than watercourse-based mostly approaches similar fopen() oregon ifstream if lone checking for beingness. Debar repeatedly checking for the aforesaid record’s beingness inside a loop. Cache the consequence for improved ratio.
- Prioritize
std::filesystem::existssuccessful contemporary C++. - Usage
stat()for show successful C oregon older C++ requirements.
See mistake dealing with for much sturdy codification. For illustration, permissions points tin forestall entree equal if a record exists. Scheme calls tin uncover these particulars.
[Infographic placeholder: Evaluating show of antithetic record beingness cheque strategies crossed antithetic working methods]
Increase.Filesystem
For pre-C++17 tasks, Increase.Filesystem presents akin performance to std::filesystem, offering a transportable and businesslike resolution.
- See the Increase.Filesystem room.
- Usage
increase::filesystem::exists().
Larn much astir businesslike record dealing with methods.FAQ
Q: Is entree() a bully alternate for checking record beingness?
A: Piece entree() tin cheque record beingness and permissions, it’s mostly little businesslike than stat() oregon std::filesystem::exists for purely checking beingness. It’s about utile once you demand to confirm circumstantial entree rights.
Selecting the correct methodology for checking record beingness is important for penning businesslike and sturdy C++ functions. By knowing the choices disposable successful antithetic C++ requirements and C, and contemplating elements similar portability and show, builders tin brand knowledgeable choices to optimize their record dealing with operations. Retrieve, broad, concise codification coupled with businesslike practices leads to amended package.
- Ever see possible errors, specified arsenic permissions points.
- Cache outcomes to debar redundant checks inside loops.
Research assets similar cppreference.com and Increase.Filesystem documentation for additional insights. For precocious record scheme operations, see studying astir record watching and notification mechanisms, which supply much businesslike methods to path record adjustments. Record Direction (Home windows) supplies much level circumstantial accusation. By mastering these strategies, you tin importantly heighten the show and reliability of your record-dealing with codification.
Question & Answer :
I would similar to discovery the quickest manner to cheque if a record exists successful modular C++eleven, 14, 17, oregon C. I person hundreds of information and earlier doing thing connected them I demand to cheque if each of them be. What tin I compose alternatively of /* Thing */ successful the pursuing relation?
inline bool be(const std::drawstring& sanction) { /* Thing */ }
Fine I threw unneurotic a trial programme that ran all of these strategies a hundred,000 instances, fractional connected records-data that existed and fractional connected information that didn’t.
#see <sys/stat.h> #see <unistd.h> #see <drawstring> #see <fstream> inline bool exists_test0 (const std::drawstring& sanction) { ifstream f(sanction.c_str()); instrument f.bully(); } inline bool exists_test1 (const std::drawstring& sanction) { if (Record *record = fopen(sanction.c_str(), "r")) { fclose(record); instrument actual; } other { instrument mendacious; } } inline bool exists_test2 (const std::drawstring& sanction) { instrument ( entree( sanction.c_str(), F_OK ) != -1 ); } inline bool exists_test3 (const std::drawstring& sanction) { struct stat buffer; instrument (stat (sanction.c_str(), &buffer) == zero); }
Outcomes for entire clip to tally the one hundred,000 calls averaged complete 5 runs,
